The 100: a tedious final season

THE 100

It now seems hard to believe, but there was a time when the CW’s apocalyptic sci-fantasy The 100 was receiving high praise. The show’s second season even received some good critical reviews, being as it was a cohesive, character-driven discussion of conflict with strong themes.

Season 2 of The 100 took the characterisation it established in its messy and often silly first year and then let those dominos fall organically over an intelligent and well-written season that examined a range of complex moral and ethical issues. It was by far the peak of the show’s writing and hooked a lot of viewers looking for exactly this kind of show.

Season 2 examined such war-time quandaries as the World War 2 Coventry bombing – where the Allies had to decide between evacuating Coventry and letting the Germans know they cracked their code – and the ethics of handing over your citizens to an enemy for punishment over war crimes.

The extent to which preserving life conflicts with the need to take it is a question the show asks repeatedly throughout its run and nowhere near as powerfully or as painfully as in the finale of its second season.

Screen Shot 2020-07-26 at 12.12.42 pm

There was a time, long long ago in a galaxy far far away, when The 100 used to have something to say. Something more profound than “humanity sucks” and “we’re all doomed”.

As someone of the strongly-held opinion that humanity does, in fact, suck and we are definitely all doomed, it’s not that I disagree with the writers’ pessimism generally. But execution matters in television. So does thematic coherence, plotting and consistent characterisation. A tragedy born of humanity’s inherent flaws must first start with believably flawed humans. The tragedy is therefore organic and the viewer is able to hold out hope while being borne towards the inevitable.

Screen Shot 2020-07-26 at 3.06.25 pm

A show like the iconic Breaking Bad is the perfect example of this, as is the recent Korean drama Extracurricular. Create strong characters, expose them to an external impetus, and then explore their behaviour from there. Great television comes when the external does not overwhelm the internal but merely uses it to showcase the show’s themes.

It’s why characterisation matters even more in plot-driven genres such as science fiction. Yet ironically it’s the one thing science fiction writers often struggle with. As seasons progress, the temptation to grab your character and place them where you want them to be and get them to do what you want them to do gets stronger. But great science fiction resists this temptation, as recent shows like The Expanse have shown us.

The 100 is not great science fiction. But its early flirtation with greatness is why the show’s biggest tragedy is not the annihilation of Earth but of itself.

The-100-Praimfaya

The 100’s problem over the last several years is that it has reduced its characters – all its characters – to ciphers. And its main concept – that humanity begins and ends at the need for survival – is simply recycled over and over again in new and frequently uninteresting ways until the show is some kind of fifth-generation writing paper that retains the memory of what it once was but falls apart as soon as you try to put a pen to it.

The show unfolding on our televisions bears little resemblance to the show that started all the way back in  2014. Earth is gone, destroyed by humanity and its penchant for destruction. Last season we met the inhabitants of Sanctum; a society on a new planet run by a cult and looking remarkably like Stargate SG:1 and The Shannara Chronicles had a rather confused baby.

Screen Shot 2020-07-26 at 11.46.55 am

Why The 100 destroyed Earth and proceeded with a new planet made little sense to me when they arranged a new, bigger Praimfaya at the end of Season 4 and then finally destroyed what was left of Earth at the end of Season 5.

But now their reasoning seems clear and it has little to do with coherent storytelling or commitment to the show. It has everything to do with setting up one or more spinoffs; including a prequel for which we got an excruciating backdoor pilot that merely made this season even more plodding.

It also does this show no favours to keep comparing itself to a show like SG1, one that retained its themes, characterisation and wit through eight seasons and – while somewhat compromised by changing networks – was still worth watching at season 10.

Screen Shot 2020-07-26 at 11.36.17 am

Since its seventh and final season started, The 100 has been many things. But the worst of these is that it’s tiresome. Previous seasons of the show have suffered from the same criticisms: that it separates the characters we most care about; that it tries to mask a lack of plot with a lot of running around; that its ethical quandaries have become somewhat trite; that it uses time jumps off screen to change character dynamics rather than showing organic development; and that the showrunner treats badly any actor he’s had a personal falling out with (this season it’s Bob Morley, who plays the very popular Bellamy).

For many people, Bellamy and Clarke’s relationship has underpinned the show from the beginning whether you see it as potentially romantic or not. Both are natural leaders but Clarke has traditionally been a high-level strategic thinker while Bellamy is emotional and relationship-based.

1524754309-bellamy-clarke-the-100-season-4

Known thematically as the head and the heart, the show’s contention that they work better together is a strong metaphor for the marriage of an evidence-based and a human-based approach. Bellamy needs Clarke to stop him from reacting too quickly and rashly, Clarke needs Bellamy to keep her grounded. Bellamy, you could say, doesn’t see the forest for the trees. Clarke forgets the forest is made up of trees. Either way, for societies to function properly, we need both.

By benching Bellamy, the 100 has cut out the literal heart of its show. And by removing Clark from the position of strategic leader it has also lost its head. As such, Season 7 suffers from a new problem: it’s boring and thematically weak.

To lay the groundwork they need for the future spinoffs, the cast has been splintered into three plotlines. Indra, Murphy, Emory and the rest of Earth’s refugees are back at Sanctum, which is being threatened by JR Bourne’s amazing scenery chewing Sheidheda who has taken over Russell Prime’s body. Diyoza, Hope, Octavia and then Gabriel spend several years trying to escape from Skyring before arriving on the planet Bardo, run by a cult. And Clarke, Raven, Niylah, Miller and the insufferable Jordan are bouncing through the Stargate network the anomaly transit system looking for their friends.

the-100-s7-e1588959347648

The 100 is attempting a kaleidoscopic mode of storytelling, one that they first used for the bunker plotline in Season 5. A kaleidoscopic structure involves episodes that tell us pieces of the overall story, leading finally to an episode that brings the whole picture together.

It’s a frustrating structure if not handled expertly, especially if your characterisation is weak. And for most characters on our screens, we simply haven’t had enough time or development for them to be anything but.

With all the running around, flashbacks and characters popping into and out of anomalies, it’s difficult at this point of the season to know if the plot is moving too quickly or if the problem is that there is no plot at all. What theme is The 100 even exploring? At this stage I couldn’t tell you and that was something I could do even in the nadir of previous seasons.

Worse than that, the retcons needed to make a prequel work have undermined much of the show’s original mythology. I have yet to see a parent show that wasn’t gutted to birth its dramatic offspring – the aforementioned Stargate SG-1 being one of the few exceptions – and The 100 seems determined to do the same thing. Many of the show’s more original and organic elements – such as the evolution of the language Trigedasleng or the rise of the tribal culture the 100 encountered when they first landed – have been sacrificed to the promised prequel.

With the show on hiatus until August and seven episodes left, it’s possible the writers will manage to draw this all together in an ending that is satisfying. But at this stage they seem more determined to set themselves up for future shows than in resolving this one in any coherent way.

And that’s a sad end to this particular story.


3 thoughts on “The 100: a tedious final season

  1. Lee, I enjoyed reading your thoughts on the 100 very much. Ironically, the other day I asked my wife where she had got to in her watch because I was struggling to remember where I had got to. Somewhere in, or at the end of Season 3, I think. She suggested I dive in and start watching. I said no I wouldn’t because I suspected I would become frustrated in doing this.

    Yes, Season 2 was very, very good. I think I may have seen glimpses of Season 4, hence my reluctance. In short, I had high hopes for the 100. It was a great concept.

    As for the Expanse, I cannot speak highly enough re what it has become. The shifting political landscape, the depth to the characters, the touches of space opera, an alien entity that may or may not be a human construct and the nods to what it is actually like to be out there and how it all can play with your mind.

    That The 100 may now have become the offspring of Stargate and the Shannara Chronicles tells me all I really need to know 😎 As an aside, the Shannara Chronicles does have its ooh ah moments.

    We are Stargate fans and I interact with Joe Mallozzi on his blog re his involvement with it and his other fabulous creations such as Dark Matter – he is very generous with the knowledge he shares. He also has a number of new shows around the corner.

    By way of contrast, I still lament the passing of Babylon 5. We enjoyed every moment and the level of space operatic diplomacy was a pure delight.

    As for The 100, I might now just leave its potential kaleidoscope of wonder be. That’s what my gut is telling me. Meanwhile, my wife is systematically making her way yet again through all the Star Treks. I don’t need to do this yet. I have watched the Foundation promos and if it’s as good as it looks, finally something that will be truly epic, and I hope faithful to Asimov’s vision.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I love The Expanse, Stargate SG1 and Babylon 5 is extraordinary. I did start a B5 rewatch and even did an initial post on it but life intervened and it didn’t get far. I should get back to it because B5 is almost eerie in how it predicted the way in which late-stage capitalism would morph into fascism. It was well ahead of its time.

      The 100 is terrible. Be glad you dropped it. I’m just holding out for the last two episodes so I can hold a cancellation party and finally be free of it. FREE!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Stargate is on its way back. The next season of the Expanse can’t come around quick enough for me.

        Straczynski was amazing in what he pulled together re B5, and his understanding of the political systems was unparalleled. I always kept my fingers crossed that he would get B5 back underway again. From memory, I think he didn’t want to sell out. I even enjoyed Crusade, even though it was short lived.

        The diplomatic intrigues in B5 would have me riveted. They always reminded me of the “little dance the merry dances” I was involved in from time to time.

        Lol re The 100. Be free and roam the drama landscape once more 😂

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s